Legal Opinion
Elder v. Cardoso
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 10, 1992No. A92A0501, A92A0712, A92A0713PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Presiding Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff Dr. Ronald Elder is a pediatrician. Appelleedefendants Dr. David Cardoso, Dr. Samuel Goodrich, Dr. Suzanne Palmer and Dr. Curtis Veal are obstetricians and appellee-defendant Milledgeville OB-GYN Associates, P.C. (P.C.) is their professional corporation. Alleging that his professional reputation and medical practice had. been damaged, appellant brought suit against appellees for slander and tortious interference with his contractual and business relations. Appellees answered and, after discovery, cross-motions for summary judgment were filed. As to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kurtz v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Cohen v. HartlageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Bergen v. Martindale-Hubbell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- King v. MassonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Collins v. West American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Information Systems and Networks Corp. v. The City of Atlanta, Herbert L. McCallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Jack T. Hammer v. Edward L. Slater, Loretta Slater, Herbert Jaffess, Renee JaffessCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- O'NEAL v. Home Town Bank of Villa RicaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Reilly v. Associated PressMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Webster v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.