Legal Opinion

Burton L. Spellman and Roslyn Spellman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 21, 1988No. 87-2177PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

Since 1954 a taxpayer has been allowed to deduct from his income, as a current expense, “research or experimental expenditures which are paid or incurred ... during the taxable year in connection with his trade or business.” 26 U.S.C. § 174(a)(1). This exceptional treatment — exceptional because research and development expenditures are capital in nature, since they yield benefits over a period of time rather than when incurred — may reflect the fact that such expenditures create what economists call “external benefits.” These are benefits that the producer cannot…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Whipple v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Snow v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bernard A. Levin, Phyllis Levin, Alan T. Hrabosky, and Delores Hrabosky v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Green v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Sink v. Knox County HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
  2. David and Lynette Kindred v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Sharon D. Kantor, Robert E. Kantor v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Louis H. Diamond, Madelene Diamond v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. Diamond v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API