Burton L. Spellman and Roslyn Spellman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
Since 1954 a taxpayer has been allowed to deduct from his income, as a current expense, “research or experimental expenditures which are paid or incurred ... during the taxable year in connection with his trade or business.” 26 U.S.C. § 174(a)(1). This exceptional treatment — exceptional because research and development expenditures are capital in nature, since they yield benefits over a period of time rather than when incurred — may reflect the fact that such expenditures create what economists call “external benefits.” These are benefits that the producer cannot…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Whipple v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Snow v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bernard A. Levin, Phyllis Levin, Alan T. Hrabosky, and Delores Hrabosky v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Green v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Sink v. Knox County HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
- David and Lynette Kindred v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Sharon D. Kantor, Robert E. Kantor v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Louis H. Diamond, Madelene Diamond v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Diamond v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.