Legal Opinion
Kronz v. Kronz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 16, 1990No. 25 and 26PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
The issue in this appeal is whether a court abuses its discretion by indefinitely enjoining the foreclosure of a defaulted mortgage against commercial real estate because of a pending divorce action between the husband and wife owner-mortgagors.
In July, 1986, Deborah and John Kronz, husband and wife, obtained a loan from First Seneca Bank in the amount of two hundred thousand ($200,000.00) dollars. The loan was secured by a first mortgage on commercial real estate known as the Jade Building, which the borrowers owned in Thornburg, Allegheny County. Shortly thereafter, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- In Re Upset Sale, Tax Cl. Bureau of BerksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Katz v. KatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Sinking Fund Commissioners of Phila. v. Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hanson v. Federal Signal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Segal v. GoodmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. StaatsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Keller v. Re/Max Centre RealtySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- David Waathdad v. Cyfred, Ltd.Supreme Court of Guam · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.