Legal Opinion
Segal v. Goodman
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1993No. 20505PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTGOMERY, Justice.
Defendant-appellant Len Goodman appeals from a judgment awarded to plaintiff-appellee Nora Segal, holding that Goodman was liable for damages suffered by Segal as a result of an investment in an unregistered security. Segal cross-appeals from the court’s order granting Goodman a stay of execution of the judgment. We affirm the judgment on the ground that substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that Goodman was a salesman or agent of a seller of an unregistered security, affirm the court’s stay of execution on the ground that the court did not abuse…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Strata Production Co. v. Mercury Exploration Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Samuel B. Ballen v. Prudential Bache Securities, Inc. Prudential Bache Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Hill v. Community of Damien of MolokaiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Mannick v. WakelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.