Legal Opinion

Keller v. Re/Max Centre Realty

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

We are asked to determine whether subsection (b) of the Comparative Negligence Act (the Act), 42 Pa.C.S. § 7102(b), permits homeowners, who obtained a combined jury verdict for deceit against the previous homeowner, her realtor, and the realty company, to collect the entire jury verdict from the realty company where the jury apportioned only fifty-five (55%) percent of the total award against the realty company. We find, as did the trial court, that the Act, by its express terms, is applicable only to actions sounding in negligence resulting in death or injuries to persons or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sack v. FeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. In Re Upset Sale, Tax Cl. Bureau of BerksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Aiello v. Ed Saxe Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Moran v. G. & W.H. Corson, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Hairston v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Gleit. H. v. Nguyen, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Osborne v. Neville, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2004
  5. Remmert v. EDA Contractors, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API