Legal Opinion

Dolan v. Hudson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1968No. File 10416PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs, Raymond B. Dolan and wife, as owners and sellers brought this action for specific performance of a contract to sell residential property against Douglas M. Hudson and wife, defendants and buyers. Defendants answered alleging principally that the purchase agreement was not specifically enforceable because: Their assent was given under a mistake of fact; their assent was obtained by unfair practice; the purchase agreement is ambiguous; plaintiffs have not performed their undertakings under the purchase agreement; and title insurance tendered was not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Beatty v. DepueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Brown v. Memorial National Home FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Larson v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. ShewmakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Maere v. ChurchillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. State v. RothSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Mattson v. RachettoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Amdahl v. LoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API