Legal Opinion

Manning v. Gossett Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 14, 1939No. 14985PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

This respondent was an employee of Gossett Mills at Anderson, S. C., and while so engaged sustained an injury, while engaged in the course of his employment. Liberty Mu tual Insurance Company, appellant herein, was then the insurance carrier for Gossett Mills. All the parties to this litigation are subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Act of this State (Act No. 610 of the Acts of the General Assembly of South Carolina for 1936, Act July 17, 1935, 39 St. at Large, p. 1231), and are bound by its terms and provisions. As a result of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rudd v. Fairforest Finishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Murdaugh v. Robert Lee Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Stanley v. . Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Stanley v. Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Stewart v. McLellan's Stores Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API