Legal Opinion
People v. Quinones
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 31, 2012PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that *1303Supreme Court erred in determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Defendant failed to request a downward departure to a level two risk, and thus he failed to preserve for our review his contention that the court erred in failing to afford him that downward departure from his presumptive level three risk (see People v Ratcliff, 53 AD3d 1110 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 708 [2008]). In any event, we conclude that “defendant failed to present clear and convincing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. McDanielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. RatcliffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. IrvingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. CummingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. RottermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. HavensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. McCallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- HAVENS, TERRI T., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.