Legal Opinion
People v. Rotterman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 8, 2012PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Erie County Court (Kenneth F. Case, J.), entered June 3, 2011. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court complied with the statutory mandate to set forth “the findings of fact and conclusions of law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. BowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. QuinonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. PichcuskieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- ADAMS, RODNEY, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- JOHNSON, KEVIN C., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.