Legal Opinion
Guy v. Crown Equipment Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 15, 2004No. 19-40963PublishedCited by 406 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
For her design defect claim under the Mississippi Products Liability Act, Miss. Code Ann. § 11-1-63 et seq. (MPLA), Michelle Guy challenges judgment as a mat ter of law awarded Crown Equipment Corporation, following Guy’s case in chief. Guy contends the district court reversibly erred by excluding Guy’s intended expert witness before trial and by excluding certain evidence offered during Guy’s examination of Crown’s expert, called as an adverse witness. In addition, Guy claims she presented sufficient evidence during her ease in chief to avoid judgment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Watkins v. Telsmith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by406 opinions
- Alexandro Puga v. About Tyme Transport, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Wanda Williams v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Life Partners Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Chlopek v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
401 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.