Legal Opinion

United States v. Kay

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 24, 2007No. 05-20604PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

David Kay and Douglas Murphy, executives at an American company that exported rice to Haiti in the 1990’s, paid Haitian officials to reduce duties and taxes on their rice. Kay disclosed this activity to the attorney for his employer, the SEC investigated, and Murphy and Kay were prosecuted for violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA” or “the Act”). The district court dismissed the indictment, concluding that the FCPA did not cover bribes to reduce duties and taxes. We reversed the dismissal of the indictment and remanded to the district court,…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. United States v. StarnesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. OllisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Carlos Pedroza-RochaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. James BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  5. Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API