Legal Opinion

Williams v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1996No. WD 50579PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAURA DENVIR STITH, Presiding Judge.

Casualty Reciprocal Exchange (Casualty) appeals from a jury verdict in the amount of $40,000 in favor of Marcus Dwane Williams. Casualty is the uninsured motorist carrier for Mr. Williams’ employer and raises two points on appeal. First, Casualty argues the trial court erred in permitting plaintiff to argue an adverse inference based on Casualty’s failure to call a medical doctor to testify on issues relevant to damages. We agree that the doctor was equally available and thus the trial court erred in permitting plaintiff to argue the inference. We find,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Lester v. SaylesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Halpin v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Tune v. Synergy Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  4. Aldcroft v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  5. Cano v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Porter v. Toys 'R' US-Delaware, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Gillen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Blum v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
  4. Nevada Commission on Ethics v. BallardNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. American Standard Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. BrachtMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API