Legal Opinion

Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Ballard

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2004No. 41785PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*863OPINION

2Per curiam

In this appeal, we must decide whether the Nevada Commission on Ethics had the authority to (1) determine whether respondents’ “Notice[s] in lieu of Statement of Financial Disclosure” and related filings satisfied NRS 281.561’s requirement that a political candidate file a financial disclosure statement;2 and (2) seek civil penalties against respondents for violating NRS 281.561. Because we conclude that the Commission acted within its authority, we reverse.

BACKGROUND

Respondents were candidates for public office in Nevada’s 2002 general election.3 Under NRS 281.561(1), each respondent…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. Thomas E. VerkuilenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Barry v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carrigan v. Commission on EthicsNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Carrigan v. Nev. Comm'n on EthicsNevada Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API