Commonwealth v. Rightley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order arresting judgment against defendant, John Rightley [hereinafter “Rightley”]. After the third trial on the matter, a jury convicted Rightley of two counts each of simple assault and aggravated assault. Rightly asserted in post-trial motions that the third trial violated his double jeopardy rights, and that the evidence at trial was insufficient to sustain a conviction for aggravated assault. The trial court arrested judgment on the aggravated assault charges, agreeing that the evidence was insufficient. The Commonwealth appeals that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. QuinlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. CassidySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. RodriquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.