Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rightley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1992No. 930PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order arresting judgment against defendant, John Rightley [hereinafter “Rightley”]. After the third trial on the matter, a jury convicted Rightley of two counts each of simple assault and aggravated assault. Rightly asserted in post-trial motions that the third trial violated his double jeopardy rights, and that the evidence at trial was insufficient to sustain a conviction for aggravated assault. The trial court arrested judgment on the aggravated assault charges, agreeing that the evidence was insufficient. The Commonwealth appeals that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
  4. Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. QuinlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. CassidySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. RodriquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API