Legal Opinion

Carrizales v. State Farm Lloyds

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 29, 2008No. 06-40286PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

Javier and Eva Carrizales (“Plaintiffs”) urge that Texas’s standardized homeowners insurance policy with State Farm Lloyds (“State Farm”) covers mold contamination resulting from a plumbing leak. The district court determined that it did not and entered summary judgment in favor of State Farm. Plaintiffs also challenge the district court’s trial instruction to the jury that the failure to mitigate damages is a condition precedent to recovery. We affirm on the former conclusion but must reverse and remand for a new trial on the jury instruction. Plaintiffs’ duty to mitigate may reduce their…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Harwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Kelley-Coppedge, Inc. v. Highlands Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State Farm Lloyds v. PageTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Huston v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  3. Q Clothier v. Twin City Fire InsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  4. Don Powers v. Northside Independent Sch DisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  5. Bagby Elevator Company, Inc. v. Derald ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API