Legal Opinion

Liuksila v. Stoll

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 2005No. 03-FM-1226PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

This case concerns a German child support order (“the German order”), issued in 1997, which was registered in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (“URESA”), D.C.Code §§ 30-341.1 et seq. (1997) (revised and recodified *503as the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (“UIFSA”), D.C.Code §§ 46-301.01 et seq. (2001)). By the terms of that order, appellant Aarno Liuksila was directed to pay support arrears to appellee Jutta Stoll, whose daughter Liisa Stoll is the child whose support is at issue.1 Mr. Liuksila…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goldkind v. Snider Bros., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Kammerman v. KammermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Carrollsburg v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Christopher v. AguiguiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Galbis v. NadalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sollars v. CullyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API