Legal Opinion
United States v. Poynter
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 7, 2012No. Criminal Case No. 07-48PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Defendant William F. Poynter, who is proceeding pro se, has filed a motion and various supplemental motions for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. Defendant has also filed a separate motion to correct alleged inaccuracies in transcripts of his trial and a subsequent hearing, and several other procedural motions regarding his receipt of trial transcripts and his legal representation. For the reasons explained below, defendant’s motions will be DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
On March 1, 2007, defendant William Poynter was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. DaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Ruben Zuno-ArceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Edward Kuzniar and George PistasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. NelsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013