Legal Opinion
United States v. Ruben Zuno-Arce
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 5, 2003No. 98-56770PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Valerio v. Crawford, 306 F.3d 742, 764 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1788, 155 L.Ed.2d 695 (2003), overruled the portion of United States v. Zuno-Arce, 209 F.3d 1095, 1100-01 (9th Cir.2000), amended (to include partial dissent) by 245 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir.2001), that applied Circuit Rule 22-1(d). 1 In accordance with Valerio, we now must consider the appellate briefing in Zuno-Arce as a request to expand the certificate of appealability (“COA”) issued by the district court. We deny a COA as to the Mooney-Napue 2 claim, the ineffective…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Blufford Hayes, Jr. v. Jill Brown, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jackson v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Hayes v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Hein v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Bruce Wayne Morris v. Eddie Ylst, Acting Warden for the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.