Legal Opinion

United States v. Nelson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 25, 2013No. Criminal No. 2011-0059PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge

Petitioner Gregory Nelson moves under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, arguing that the prosecution violated his due process rights by suppressing evidence favorable to him, in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). The parties have briefed and argued the issues. Because the government violated its duty to disclose all exculpatory evidence and prejudiced Nelson, Nelson’s motion will be granted. 1

BACKGROUND

On April 11, 2011, Nelson pled guilty to traveling from…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. George Alvarez v. City of BrownsvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. Joseph A. Buffey v. David Ballard, WardenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Garcia v. HudakDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  5. State v. ArtusoOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API