Legal Opinion

Pavlic v. Haley

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelix J. Aulisi, J.

An order granted on November 18, 1963, directs the inspectors of election of the First and Fourth Election Districts of the Town of Duanesburg,. Schenectady County, to show cause why they should not reconvene, recanvass and correct the statement of canvass and return insofar as it affects the votes cast in the general election held on November 5, 1963, for the office of Supervisor of said town and for an adjudication of the validity of rejected and void ballots in said election districts.

The petitioner, Stanley M. Pavlic, was the Democratic and Liberal candidate for the office of Supervisor.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Colne v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. Matter of Moritt v. Cohen, HerzkaNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Devine v. OsmannNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Harris v. HulbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  5. Matter of Smith v. BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scanlon v. SavagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Pavlic v. HaleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  3. Roe v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Young v. FruciNew York Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API