Matter of Moritt v. Cohen, Herzka
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
We give our judgment upon the ballots submitted to us for determination. We number them according to exhibit numbers. The following ballots, according to exhibit numbers, are declared void: 11, 60, 77, 81, 86, 90, 97, 107, 128, 29, 103, 106, 85.
The following ballots we find to be good and should be counted accordingly: 19, 44, 51 (objections withdrawn), 114 (objections withdrawn), 95, 115 (objections withdrawn), 119, 78, 123.
The order should be affirmed.
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Rippey, JJ.; concur; Finch, J., taking no part.
Order affirmed.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Wene v. MeynerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Franke v. McNabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Scanlon v. SavagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- O'Shaughnessy v. Monroe County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Pavlic v. HaleyNew York Supreme Court · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.