Legal Opinion

Matter of Moritt v. Cohen, Herzka

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1938PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

We give our judgment upon the ballots submitted to us for determination. We number them according to exhibit numbers. The following ballots, according to exhibit numbers, are declared void: 11, 60, 77, 81, 86, 90, 97, 107, 128, 29, 103, 106, 85.

The following ballots we find to be good and should be counted accordingly: 19, 44, 51 (objections withdrawn), 114 (objections withdrawn), 95, 115 (objections withdrawn), 119, 78, 123.

The order should be affirmed.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Rippey, JJ.; concur; Finch, J., taking no part.

Order affirmed.

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wene v. MeynerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Franke v. McNabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Scanlon v. SavagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. O'Shaughnessy v. Monroe County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  5. Pavlic v. HaleyNew York Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API