Legal Opinion
Loren v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mich.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 20, 2007No. 06-2090PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellants Eugene Loren (“Loren”) and Danielle Hagemann (“Ha-gemann”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s order granting Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan’s (“BCBSM”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims brought pursuant to Sections 502(a)(2) and 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), codified in 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(2) and 1132(a)(3), respectively. 1 Plaintiffs allege that BCBSM violated its fiduciary duties under ERISA, and they seek to represent a class of all participants and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- Pfahler v. National Latex Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Elena David v. J. AlphinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Daniel Soehnlen v. Fleet Owners Ins. FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Cleveland Housing Renewal Project v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Bench Billboard Co. v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.