Legal Opinion

Cleveland Housing Renewal Project v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 20, 2010No. 09-3571, 09-3648PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

This is a public nuisance action brought against Deutsche Bank Trust Company and affiliated companies (“Deutsche Bank”), in relation to twenty-five vacant properties in and around Cleveland owned by Deutsche Bank. Plaintiff Cleveland Housing Renewal Project, Inc. (“CHRP”), filed the action in the Cleveland Municipal Housing Court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. Deutsche Bank removed the action to federal court based on the parties’ diversity of citizenship. However, the district court granted CHRP’s motion to remand. The court concluded that subject…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. City of Vestavia Hills v. General Fidelity InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Charvat v. EchoStar Satellite, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Michael Ashford v. Aeroframe Services, L.L.C., etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. Gray v. BushCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Varsity Brands, Inc. v. Star Athletica, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API