Legal Opinion
Bench Billboard Co. v. City of Cincinnati
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 10, 2012No. 10-3750PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS A. VARLAN, District Judge.
This case arises out of Bench Billboard Company’s desire to place its advertising benches on private property and in the public rights-of-way in the City of Cincinnati (the “City”). Bench Billboard Company (“Bench Billboard”) first sued the City in 1993, challenging the legality of the City’s ordinances limiting Bench Billboard’s ability to place its advertising benches in the public rights-of-way and on private property. The parties settled, and as part of the settlement, the City granted Bench Billboard three hundred replacement permits to place…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Bible Believers v. Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Andy Thayer v. Ralph ChiczewskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Conference of Catholic BishopsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Robert McKay v. William FederspielCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Ronald Loesel v. City of FrankenmuthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.