Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Wolff Petroleum, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 20, 1991No. 3419PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This appeal is from an order which denied a petition by a workmen’s compensation carrier seeking intervention by the carrier in the plaintiff-employee’s third party tort action. After careful review, we conclude that the trial court’s order in this case was interlocutory and that an appeal, therefore, will not lie.

As a general rule, an appeal will not lie from an order denying intervention, because such an order is not a final determination of the claim made by the would-be intervenor. However, in some cases, the order denying intervention has the practical effect of denying…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boise Cascade Corp. v. East Stroudsburg Savings Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Maginley v. Robert J. Elliott, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Van Den Heuval v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. McGinnis v. United Screw & Bolt Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Luiziaga v. PsolkaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API