Kelley v. Wolff Petroleum, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
This appeal is from an order which denied a petition by a workmen’s compensation carrier seeking intervention by the carrier in the plaintiff-employee’s third party tort action. After careful review, we conclude that the trial court’s order in this case was interlocutory and that an appeal, therefore, will not lie.
As a general rule, an appeal will not lie from an order denying intervention, because such an order is not a final determination of the claim made by the would-be intervenor. However, in some cases, the order denying intervention has the practical effect of denying…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. East Stroudsburg Savings Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Maginley v. Robert J. Elliott, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Van Den Heuval v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- McGinnis v. United Screw & Bolt Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- Luiziaga v. PsolkaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994