Legal Opinion

Coble v. Knight

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 1, 1998No. COA97-1167PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

Under North Carolina law, the theory of negligent entrustment' imposes liability only upon an owner not otherwise responsible for the conduct of the driver of the vehicle. Frugard v. Pritchard, 112 N.C. App. 84, 89, 434 S.E.2d 620, 624 (1993). In this case, the plaintiff urges us to extend negligent entrustment liability to a non-owner father who delivered vehicle keys to his twenty year old son when he knew or at least should have known that his son was intoxicated at the time of the delivery. Because under the existing law in this State, ownership must be proven to establish a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Mills v. Continental Parking CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Hulse v. DriverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Bogen v. . BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coleman v. HinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. DeWester v. WatkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Bruno v. Concept Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Tart v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API