Legal Opinion

Tart v. Martin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 2000No. COA99-401PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Chief Judge.

Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings, depositions, admissions and affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. N.C.R.Civ.P. 56(c). On motion for summary judgment, the court must closely scrutinize the papers of the party moving for summary judgment, drawing all inferences from proof in favor of the non-movant. Shuford, N.C.Practice and Procedure, § 56-5 (5th ed. 1998 & Supp).

We therefore must decide whether a material issue of fact remains as to whether the Martins are the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Byrne v. BordeauxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Grindstaff v. WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Swicegood v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tart v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Griswold v. Integon General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API