Legal Opinion

Duso v. Groton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 9, 2025No. SC21082Published

1Opinion of the Court

DONNA DUSO ET AL. v. TOWN OF GROTON (SC 21082) McDonald, D’Auria, Ecker, Dannehy and Elgo, Js. Syllabus The plaintiffs, retired law enforcement officers formerly employed by the defendant town, sought a judgment declaring that, pursuant to a pension agreement between the town and the union that had represented them during their employment, they were entitled to the same contributions to their health savings accounts (HSAs) that the town makes to the HSAs of police officers currently employed by the town (active police officers). The provision of the pension agreement addressing the scope of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. United Illuminating Co. v. Wisvest-Connecticut, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Morton Buildings, Inc. v. BannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API