Department of Highways of Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
This is an appeal by the Department of Highways from certain orders of the Public Utility Commission placing upon that department a portion of the cost of maintenance, alteration, and repair of a structure made to eliminate a grade crossing over two railroads. We are all of the opinion that the orders should be affirmed.
In 1910, Prospect Viaduct in Johnstown, a city of the third class, was constructed “under the joint sponsorship” of that city and the Pennsylvania Railroad Company. It was erected over the tracks of the Conemaugh & Black Lick Railroad Company and of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Somerset County v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Erie Railroad v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Conshohocken Boro. v. Pa. P.U.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Pennsylvania R.R. v. P.S.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Philadelphia Suburban Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Department of Highways of Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Delaware River Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Department of Highways v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.