Legal Opinion

Conshohocken Boro. v. Pa. P.U.C.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1938PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Argued December 12, 1938. These appeals are by the boroughs of Conshohocken and West Conshohocken, Montgomery County, from an order of the Public Utility Commission allocating the cost of maintenance of a bridge over a stream and the facilities of public service companies. The appeals were argued together and, as the questions involved are the same, they will be considered in one opinion. We are all of the opinion that the order must be affirmed.

The bridge was constructed pursuant to an order of the Public Service Commission issued July 14, 1919. With its approaches it connected Ford and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Somerset County v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Erie R. R. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Pittsburg & Lake Erie Railroad v. Lawrence CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Paradise Township v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Lancaster County v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Railways Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Wilkes-Barre v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Department of Highways of Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Jennings v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API