Legal Opinion

Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Gould

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1897No. 2,231PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the LaPorte Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Henlev, J. —

Appellee began this action in the lower court to recover damages growing out of the destruction of his property by fire. The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first paragraph charges the appellant with negligence in allowing dry grass, weeds, and other combustible material to accumulate and remain on its right of way; that the same was set on fire by one of-appellant’s locomotives, and the fire so ignited was negligently permitted to escape from the right of way to appellee’s premises, and there burned and destroyed appellee’s property. The second paragraph of the complaint is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Board of Commissioners v. BonebrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. BushIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Woollen v. WireIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Town of Kentland v. HaganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. KreigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Perrin National Bank v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API