Legal Opinion

Woollen v. Wire

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1887No. 10,783PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellant asked leave to propound to-a juror, on his voir dire, the following question : “In a case where the plaintiff is an attorney at law, and a young man, and the defendant a farmer, and an old man, upon a note payable in bank, assigned before maturity, without notice of any defence, and where the evidence shows that the note was executed by the defendant in the belief that he was only executing an agency agreement, and for which he received no consideration, for whom would you find, the plaintiff or the defendant ? ”

There was no error in refusing to permit this question to be asked.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woollen v. WhitacreIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hyundai Motor Co. v. VasquezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Board of Commissioners v. BonebrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Roller v. KlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API