Woollen v. Wire
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Wabash Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The appellant asked leave to propound to-a juror, on his voir dire, the following question : “In a case where the plaintiff is an attorney at law, and a young man, and the defendant a farmer, and an old man, upon a note payable in bank, assigned before maturity, without notice of any defence, and where the evidence shows that the note was executed by the defendant in the belief that he was only executing an agency agreement, and for which he received no consideration, for whom would you find, the plaintiff or the defendant ? ”
There was no error in refusing to permit this question to be asked.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Woollen v. WhitacreIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hyundai Motor Co. v. VasquezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Board of Commissioners v. BonebrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Roller v. KlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.