Johnson v. American Honda Motor Co.
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JEREMIAH C. LYNCH, United States Magistrate Judge.
This products liability action comes before the Court on Defendant American Honda Motor Company, Inc.’s (“Honda”) post-trial motions to strike expert testimony, for judgment as a matter of law, and for dispositive spoliation sanctions. For the reasons set forth below, Honda’s motions to strike expert testimony and for judgment as a matter of law are properly granted.
I. Background1
In March 2007, Plaintiff Johnson purchased a four-wheeled, all-terrain vehicle (“ATV”) that had been manufactured, assembled, and designed by Honda. A few months…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- H. Jerome Claar Ben Mar Maynard Young Donald Doll v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Dick Eggar Ray Ellison v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alexander v. MDU Resources GroupDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
- Alexander v. MDU Resources GroupDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
- Dalbotten v. C R Bard IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023
- Hillery v. Sun City Anthem Community Association IncDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019