Legal Opinion
George F. Martin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1960No. 6414_1PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the District Court denying appellant’s motion under § 2255 to vacate or modify a judgment and sentence charging the violation of the mail fraud statute. 18 U.S.C. § 1341. The background for the appeal is found in Martin v. United States, 10 Cir., 263 F.2d 516; 10 Cir., 273 F.2d 775.
The appellant first attacks the validity of the indictment for failure to state an offense under the mail fraud statute, the gist of which is (1) devising a scheme or artifice to defraud; and (2) the placing or causing to be placed in the post office…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wayne S. Marteney v. United States of America, C. M. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Skirvin v. MestaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Scott v. BeamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- James Wade Braswell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Webb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Karl J. BrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. James A. Irwin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Emil Richard Yates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Anna Knoll and Rose Keller v. Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Howe v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.