Legal Opinion
Lockary v. Kayfetz
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 20, 1984No. C-82-6191 SWPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, owners of undeveloped land in the unincorporated coastal community of Bolinas, bring suit under several theories challenging a 12-year-old moratorium on new water hook-ups pursuant to a declared “water emergency.” They also challenge related acts which are allegedly part of a broad conspiracy to deprive them of their constitutional rights and monopolize the tourism and water development markets in Bolinas.
Defendants are the Bolinas Community Public Utility…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Woodrum v. Woodward CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Woodrum v. Woodward CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Matthew Lockary v. Paul Kayfetz Victor Amoroso Mary Lowry Diana Lopez Fransworth Frederick B. McClellan Peter Warshall v. Pacific Legal FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Lockary v. KayfetzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Mitchell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.