Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 22, 1986No. Nos. 772-71, 773-71, 774-71 and 775-71PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIESE, Judge.
The plaintiffs in these consolidated actions are allottees of land located on the Quinault Reservation. As here assembled, this group includes approximately 1,500 individuals (in each of the consolidated actions), the Quinault Tribe, and the Quinault Allottees Association, an unincorporated association organized in early 1968 to promote the interests of the allottees of the Quinault Reservation. Their claims, first filed in the former United States Court of Claims more than fifteen years ago, seek damages based on allegations of mismanagement by the Government in its role…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Cummings v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Patton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Littlewolf v. HodelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.