Legal Opinion

Safeco Insurance v. Masood

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 2014No. CV09040785; A147177PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE MUNIZ, S. J.

The issue in this case is whether an insured, after filing a claim of loss, may condition compliance with an insurer’s information requests by requiring the insurer to execute a confidentiality agreement that imposes limitations on the insurer’s use of the insured’s personal information. Plaintiff, Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon (Safeco), refused to enter into such an agreement with the insured, Masood, and filed a declaratory judgment action. The trial court entered summary judgment for Safeco, concluding that the terms of the policy required Masood to cooperate with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLPOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Totten v. New York Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Employers Ins. of Wausau v. Tektronix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brockway v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Grants Pass Imaging & Diagnostic Center, LLC v. MarchiniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Western Property Holdings, LLC v. Aequitas Capital Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Landye Bennett Blumstein, LLP v. MutnickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Bracken v. USAA General Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API