Legal Opinion
Vaughn Rush v. Stump
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 8, 1932No. 22185PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
This is a proceeding to review an award of -the State Industrial Commission entered on the 19th day of February 1931, in a certain action then pending before the Commission wherein E. M. Stump was claimant and Vaughn & Bush Drilling Company was respondent, and Federal Surety Company was insurance carrier. After hearing the evidence the Commission found the facts as follows:
“(1) That on the 17th day of August, 1929, the claimant was in the employment and engaged in a hazardous occupation subject to and covered by the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and that on said date said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Peru Plow & Wheel Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- Dove v. Alpena Hide & Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- United States Gypsum Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Guyon v. Standard Wall Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- National Biscuit Co. v. LoutSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- City of Nichols Hills v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Andrews Mining & Milling Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.