Legal Opinion

Aronson v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1937No. L. A. 16307PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J., pro tem.

This appeal is taken from a judgment of dismissal entered after a general demurrer to plaintiffs’ complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Before entry of the judgment, plaintiffs were allowed by stipulation to tender an amended complaint, leave to file which was denied after a full hearing. A bill of exceptions was settled and filed wherein the sole specification of error is the denial of leave to amend. Inasmuch as the proposed amended complaint fails to cure the matters hereinafter noted, we will confine our review to the question whether the complaint states a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Byer v. Canadian Bank of CommerceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Tafft v. Presidio & Ferries RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Quay v. Presidio & Ferries RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Gruber v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Schneider v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Aronson v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API