Schneider v. Union Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the court sustained without leave to amend a general demurrer to her second amended complaint to establish her status as a stockholder of defendant, on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 338, subd. 3). The only question on appeal is whether the running of the statute was tolled by plaintiff’s ignorance of defendant’s unauthorized transfer of her shares of stock.
On an appeal from a judgment of dismissal sustaining a demurrer, all of the facts set forth in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Telegraph Co. v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Chester C. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant/appellant v. Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Chester C. Davis, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and Martin Cook, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants/appellees. Summa Corporation, Hughes Aircraft Corporation, Defendants- Counterclaimants/appellants v. Chester C. Davis, Davis & Cox, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and D. Martin Cook, Counterdefendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Cox v. Summa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Aweeka v. BondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.