Legal Opinion

Feliz v. Kintock Group

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 30, 2008No. 07-2805UnpublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Eddy Feliz, proceeding pro se, appeals the District Court’s order of dismissal as well as its subsequent order denying his motion seeking reconsideration of that decision. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm in part and vacate in part the District Court’s decision.

In May 2002, Feliz initiated a civil action against employees of the Kintock Group, a private contractor running a pre-release center. Named as defendants were Derrick Coates, Joseph Corbett, Nicola Cucinotta, Kathy Frank, Carmen Montanez, Darryl Olive, Mike Shniedmann, and Diane Wiley. With the exception of Mike…

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. MFS, INC. v. DilazaroDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. COTTLE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  3. Castillos v. Carmelo AriasDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. FREEMAN v. WILLIAMSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. GALTERIO v. SCI FAYETTE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API