Legal Opinion
FREEMAN v. WILLIAMS
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 15, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02655Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTWAUN FREEMAN : CIVIL ACTION : v. : No. 23-2655 : LT. MOORE, et al. : MEMORANDUM Juan R. Sánchez, J. May 15, 2024 Defendants Lt. Moore and Sgt. Jones have filed a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) to strike service of original process, arguing they were never properly served with the summons and Amended Complaint in this prisoner civil rights action. Also pending before the Court is Plaintiff Antwaun Freeman’s motion for a default judgment, filed after Defendants’ defaults were entered in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Gold Kist, Inc. v. Laurinburg Oil Company, Inc. And McNair EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Umbenhauer v. WoogCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Wayne E. Boley v. Dale KaymarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Powell v. SymonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.