Legal Opinion

Aiken v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 6, 1984No. 626-82CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

This is an action against the United States for damages based on an alleged breach of a scholarship agreement between plaintiff and the Public Health Service, Department Of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) (now Department of Health And Human Services). Plaintiff seeks to recover $36,042 plus legal interest.1 Defendant denies that it breached the scholarship agreement, but insists, instead, that plaintiff did, and that as a result thereof defendant is entitled to recover on its counterclaim.2

Both plaintiff and defendant have moved for summary judgment based on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Pauley Petroleum Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  4. Bickford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Orchards v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rendleman v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
  3. Fisher v. BowenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1987
  4. Haberman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  5. Mangual v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API