Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Bowen

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 4, 1987No. Civ. 87-98-FRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Judge:

The matters before the court are the cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff and the defendants.

Plaintiff, Katherine Fisher, filed this action against the federal defendants for mandamus and injunctive relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 seeking to require defendants to perform their duties under the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 254 et seq., and to declare the parties’ rights and obligations under a National Health Service Corps (the Corps) contract, pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201.

BACKGROUND

Fisher, a Doctor of Osteopathy, received…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aiken v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rendleman v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Dr. Kristine M. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. McManusDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1994
  4. Rendleman v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API