Legal Opinion
Doe v. LaDue
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 4, 2007No. Civil 07-2190 (DSD/SRN)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. Based upon a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the following reasons, the court grants plaintiffs’ motion.
BACKGROUND
On September 20, 1991, plaintiff John Doe was convicted of one count of a lewd act upon a child under the age of fourteen in violation of California Penal Code § 288(a). Doe was placed on probation for five years and, under California law, subjected to lifetime predatory offender registration. After the incident, in May of 1992, Doe and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- MKB Management Corp. v. BurdickDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2013
- NOKOTA HORSE CONSERVANCY, INC. v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2009
- Kodiak Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. v. BurrUnited States District Court · 2018
- Emineth v. JaegerDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2012
- Agamenv, LLC v. LaverdureDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.