Legal Opinion

MKB Management Corp. v. Burdick

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided July 22, 2013No. Case No. 1:13-cv-071PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

DANIEL L. HOVLAND, District Judge.

Before the Court is “Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction” filed on June 25, 2013, seeking an order enjoining the enforcement of North Dakota House Bill 1456. See Docket No. 3. The Plaintiffs further request the bond requirement be waived in this matter. See Docket Nos. 3 and 6. Defendant Birch Burdick filed a response on July 19, 2013. See Docket No. 22. The remaining Defendants also filed a response on July 19, 2013. See Docket No. 23. The Court allowed the Plaintiffs until July 24, 2013,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Van HollenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. Planned Parenthood of Indiana & Kentucky, Inc. v. Commissioner, Indiana State Department of HealthDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2017
  4. Kodiak Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. v. BurrUnited States District Court · 2018
  5. MKB Management Corp. v. BurdickDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API