Legal Opinion

Carnahan v. Connolly

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1902No. 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the District Court of Lake County.

1Opinion of the CourtGunter, J.

March 5, 1895, complaint in adverse suit filed in district court of Lake county, 23d of same month defendant’s demurrer. March 7, 1898, cause called by court as within rule for dismissal for want of prosecution. On motion of plaintiff’s then counsel question whether case should be dismissed for. want of prosecution under rule 18 of said court set for hearing at 2 o’clock p. m. March 8, 1898. Hearing had, plaintiff and defendant appearing by' respective counsel, evidence and argument heard. ' Court found case should- be dismissed and entered judgment in which appears: “It is ordered by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. ForceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  2. Anderson v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Rich v. StarbuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Kirk v. MeldrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. HaskinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Van Buskirk v. BalchColorado Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Miller v. East Denver Municipal Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. McWilliams v. WinslowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  4. Miller v. East Denver Municipal Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. Van Buskirk v. BalchColorado Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API