Martin v. Force

First. Upon two grounds this court has no jurisdiction to review the judgment of the court below upon the evidence. First, the bill of exceptions does not show that all the evidence is before us. This omission is fatal to our right to review the judgment upon the testimony. Greene v. McFadden, 5 Clarke (Iowa), 549; Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Garish, 39 Ill. 371. No exact form *200of words is requisite to indicate that all the evidence introduced at the trial, in the court below, is set forth in the bill of exceptions, yet it must be clearly manifest to this court, from an examination of the…