Legal Opinion

Norman v. Smedley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1961No. 39024PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs in error, Joseph L. Norman and Alma W. Norman, will be referred to herein as “plaintiffs” and the defendants in error, Arthur DeVallery Smedley and Geraline Yvonne Smedley, will be referred to as “defendants”.

In April, 1957, the guardian of Elizabeth Cox conveyed to plaintiffs the West 50 feet of Lot 1, Block 11, College Addition to Oklahoma City. The property is 108.6 feet deep. The street address of said property, which fronts on N.W. 13th Street, is 1708 N.W. 13th.

In 1950, James H. Ward and his wife conveyed all .of Lots 9 and 10, Block 11, College Addition, except a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Campau v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. McVannel v. Pure Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Anderson v. FrancisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Coal & Iron Co. v. CoppingerTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Askins v. British-American Oil Producing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nilsen v. Tenneco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Francis v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Shanks v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Tindle v. LinvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API