Legal Opinion
Irwin v. Torbert
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 11, 1948No. 16076, 16097, 16100, 16101PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Four ordinances of the City of Atlanta, a violation of which was alleged as negligence per se, were as follows: (1) Ordinance of 1908, (2) Building Code of 1924, (3) Ordinance of 1938, and (4) § 51-117 of the Code of the City of Atlanta.(a) The Ordinance of 1908 is contained in the third paragraph of the eighth amendment. The Building Code of 1924 is set forth in the second paragraph of the third amendment and the third paragraph of the eighth amendment. By section 326 of this Building Code, as contained in the eighth amendment, it is…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Minnesota v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Pauley v. Steam Gauge & Lantern Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Junkermann v. . Tilyou Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Arms v. AyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. PritchettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cox v. DeJarnetteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Mozer v. SemenzaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Beazley v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Friedman v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Camp v. EichelkrautCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.